| Heading: |
Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Independent Review |
| Question ID: |
1791184 |
| UIN: |
43045 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-04-01 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4084 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Esther McVey
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Esther McVey
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for what reason Primodos was not within the terms of reference of the Hughes Report: options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh, published on 7 February 2024. |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-04-08 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
4981 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Ashley Dalton
|
| Answering Member handle: |
AshleyDalton_MP
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@AshleyDalton_MP
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
The Government is hugely sympathetic to the families who believe that they or their children have suffered following the use of hormone pregnancy tests.The previous administration did not ask the Patient Safety Commissioner, Dr Henrietta Hughes, to look a... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
17 |
| Answering body name: |
Department of Health and Social Care |
| Tweeted: |
true |