Heading: |
Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme |
Question ID: |
1788880 |
UIN: |
41389 |
House: |
Commons |
Date tabled: |
2025-03-26 |
Asking Member ID: |
242 |
Asking Member display name: |
Sir Christopher Chope
|
Asking Member handle: |
|
Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Sir Christopher Chope
|
Member interest: |
false |
Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for what reason applicants seeking mandatory reversal of decisions made by the NHSBSA on vaccine damage claims are required as a precondition to adduce fresh evidence without which no mandatory rev |
Is named day: |
true |
Date of holding answer: |
2025-04-01 |
Date answered: |
2025-04-08 |
Date answer corrected: |
|
Is holding answer: |
false |
Is correcting answer: |
false |
Answering Member ID: |
4981 |
Answering Member display name: |
Ashley Dalton
|
Answering Member handle: |
AshleyDalton_MP
|
Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@AshleyDalton_MP
|
Correcting Member ID: |
|
Correcting Member display name: |
|
Correcting Member handle: |
|
Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
Answer text: |
If a claimant to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) wants to challenge a decision about their claim, they can ask for the decision to be reviewed. This is known as a ‘mandatory reversal’.In accordance with the legislation which governs the VDPS, whe... |
Original answer text: |
|
Comparable answer text: |
|
Answering body ID: |
17 |
Answering body name: |
Department of Health and Social Care |
Tweeted: |
true |