A question on #VaccineDamagePaymentScheme tabled by Sir Christopher Chope on 26-03-2025 has been answered by Ashley Dalton.

Heading: Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Question ID: 1788880
UIN: 41389
House: Commons
Date tabled: 2025-03-26
Asking Member ID: 242
Asking Member display name: Sir Christopher Chope
Asking Member handle:
Asking Member Twitter reference: Sir Christopher Chope
Member interest: false
Question text: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for what reason applicants seeking mandatory reversal of decisions made by the NHSBSA on vaccine damage claims are required as a precondition to adduce fresh evidence without which no mandatory rev
Is named day: true
Date of holding answer: 2025-04-01
Date answered: 2025-04-08
Date answer corrected:
Is holding answer: false
Is correcting answer: false
Answering Member ID: 4981
Answering Member display name: Ashley Dalton
Answering Member handle: AshleyDalton_MP
Answering Member Twitter reference: @AshleyDalton_MP
Correcting Member ID:
Correcting Member display name:
Correcting Member handle:
Correcting Member Twitter reference:
Answer text: If a claimant to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) wants to challenge a decision about their claim, they can ask for the decision to be reviewed. This is known as a ‘mandatory reversal’.In accordance with the legislation which governs the VDPS, whe...
Original answer text:
Comparable answer text:
Answering body ID: 17
Answering body name: Department of Health and Social Care
Tweeted: true